Within the
climate movement there is always a balancing act between personal change and
structural change. People always want
to know what they can do about climate change.
There are many, many lifestyle changes we have to make – we can either
embrace them or eventually they will be imposed upon us. Depending upon how proactively we approach
the change will determine how draconian it will eventually be.
There are
people who say that we should never talk to people about anything other than
structural change because otherwise we are indulging the fantasy that people
can stop climate change by driving a Prius and changing their lightbulbs, and
indeed, it is disturbing to me when people seem to feel quite satisfied and
complete that this is what they are doing, implying “their part”.
Perhaps more
moving is the words of Kathleen Dean Moore that the Fossil Fuel companies have
exported their shame on to us. They have
made us feel that it is we who demand these fossil fuels and their products
(never mind the decades of constructing suburbs or the constant drum beat of
advertising creating demands in our brain) and therefore they have made us
carry the shame and sense of responsibility which should be theirs.
So when I
speak of things people can do, it is never my belief that we individually have
created this situation. It is certainly
the case that we have collectively created it.
As the facts have come more and more to light of Exxon and Shell knowing
since the 70’s the reality of climate change, and concealing it and
intentionally running misinformation campaigns, they certainly hold heavy
responsibility…the kind that if there was a hell, would get you sent there.
But the
paradox is this. If the governments of
the world could actually unselfishly figure out what needs to happen and make a
plan and carry it out….it still would need to be carried out at the local
level. And in the way that grassroot
change happens it starts with ideas and actions of individuals that make
movements and movements that move governments.
As Douglas said: “Power concedes
nothing without it a demand. It never
has, it never will”. I have never known
a government to make a significant change without a people’s movement pushing
it. A few women spoke to each other and
thought of a woman’s march in response to their despair over Trump’s
inauguration and they started putting it on FB and one of the biggest national
marches of US history happened – not just once but for years afterwards.
And
ironically the research on personal behavioral change shows the biggest impacts
on our change behaviors is 1) famous people but 2) people we know
personally. Once there are 4 to 5 solar
panels visible in a several block area, the sales in that area take off while
not on the other side of town. We are
influenced by the collective.
Neale Donald
Walsch says, speaking about this same spiritual dilemma:
“It is
precisely because massive collective consciousness can overcome individual
consciousness and individual awareness that collective consciousness is so
important, and why raising the
collective consciousness of humanity is so vital. …the way to raise the
collective consciousness of humanity is, of course, to raise individual
consciousness of human beings. …The
question is whether the Divine Gift of Personal creation given to all human
beings can be used to alleviate such immense suffering.” P. 187
Thus on the
spiritual level as well as the political movement building level – we have only
ourselves to start with. But not as the
solution, but as part of the motion that creates a much larger change. We must see our change as part of a much
larger change.
So what
comes first: the movement, or the change.
The changes or the movement? I
don’t spend to much time on this koan. I
just do the work. Throughout this book
you will hear me trying to change my own anti-Earth habits, trying to
decolonize my mind, and also working to build systemic change, to end
colonization. Start where ever it makes
sense to you to start.
No comments:
Post a Comment